|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Kevin Matthews
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 679 Location: Eugene, Oregon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Landy
Joined: 15 Dec 2005 Posts: 464
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:32 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
| good response for green architecture it is a step in the right direction, most LEED certified buildings seen in magazines share an aesthetic similar to industrial sites or warehouses. well balanced...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lekizz millennium club
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 1221 Location: UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Landy
Joined: 15 Dec 2005 Posts: 464
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:02 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
Dear Lekizz my very own fault for not understanding "green buildings" my hopes are that some day i'll be mature enough in architecture to understand not only "green" buildings but the entire vocabulary that is developed with such movement.
Who can actualy tell if a builing is really green? It has to be the owner of at least of more than two very complex buildings to compare the operational cost per year or every five years on every building?
The overall LEED certified building design movement seems more of the next step for high-tech architecture rather than (the asset for the environment)
is it well written?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|